www
greetings
 

WARNING

This website contains content that is intended for a discerning audience.
You are here:

Psychic Evidence: Mentalism, Fraud, and Skepticism

The debate over psychic phenomena has long divided the public and scientific communities. While some claim genuine paranormal abilities, others argue that mentalists and psychics use well-documented psychological techniques to create the illusion of supernatural perception.


Legal Status of Psychics in the US

States/Cities with Bans

New York State (NY Penal Law § 165.35):

Other jurisdictions with restrictions:

Psychic-Friendly Jurisdictions

Most Accommodating:


Conclusion

The campaign to "sabotage" psychic performers like Uri Geller inadvertently spawned some of the most rigorous scientific research into consciousness and survival after death. From Geller's CIA-documented remote viewing at SRI to John Edward's 83% accuracy in triple-blind experiments, the evidence has grown increasingly difficult to dismiss.

While James Randi and modern mentalists like Oz Pearlman demonstrate that some apparent "psychic" abilities are simply skilled trickery, the controlled laboratory research reveals a different picture: that genuine mediumship—telepathic communication with deceased individuals—produces results that exceed chance by enormous margins and merit serious scientific investigation.

The question is no longer whether such phenomena deserve study, but what our understanding of consciousness must become to explain them.


References

[1] NYS Penal Law - Fortune Telling

[2] Wikipedia - Legality of fortune-telling

[3] City of Las Vegas - Psychic Arts License

[4] Legal Reader - Tarot Reading in the US

[5] Magickal Spot - Witchcraft & Divination in Arizona